Instead I read an article on slashdot of an Indiana University study about the Daily Show having as much substance as regular news shows. The article was short but interesting, the headline summarizes it. But what was more entertaining was the commentary below beneath the article. I found a list of bullet points that one commentator made about the current Republican party, that is to say the ones in power, not Republicans in general. And that all of the bullets could be backed up with how elected officials were acting.
- Government has a legitimate role in enforcing personal morality.
- Unilateral use of force for purposes other than immediate defense of oneself or one's allies is not inherently illegitimate.
- Achieving military objectives is more important than maintaining personal liberties.
- A free media threatens legitimate governmental interests unless placed under substantial controls.
- A strong, empowered leader granted wide powers (with which to attack our enemies) is a Good Thing.
- The executive branch of government may have a legitimate need to act outside of the law, and should be able to prevent laws from being enforced which could hamper its actions (when those actions are taken in the interests of national security).
- The executive branch of government should be able to avoid transparency when it sees fit, including in cases where it uses its powers to act in a manner not consistent with standing law in the interests of national security.
- Questioning strong leadership in the context of an active conflict is inherently unpatriotic.
- Noncitizens do not need to be granted the same rights as citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment